PUSHPENDRA AND OTHERS vs State Advocate - SH. PUSHKER CHOUBISA PP — 104/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJDG010002002026
Filing Number
185/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Dungarpur District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
Sadar Dungarpur
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUSHPENDRA AND OTHERS
Adv. SH. RISHI KUMAR DAVE
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - SH. PUSHKER CHOUBISA PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Dungarpur, Rajasthan granted bail to appellants Pushpendra and Vinod under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 11, 2026. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 117(2), 110, and 3(5) for allegedly assaulting a victim with an iron weapon causing serious injuries. The court found that despite the serious nature of charges, the accused had no prior criminal record, were in custody since March 9, 2026, investigation was incomplete, and prolonged custody served no purpose. Each accused was granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, with conditions to appear regularly in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Dungarpur, Rajasthan granted bail to appellants Pushpendra and Vinod under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 11, 2026. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 117(2), 110, and 3(5) for allegedly assaulting a victim with an iron weapon causing serious injuries. The court found that despite the serious nature of charges, the accused had no prior criminal record, were in custody since March 9, 2026, investigation was incomplete, and prolonged custody served no purpose. Each accused was granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, with conditions to appear regularly in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts