PUSHPENDRA AND OTHERS vs State Advocate - SH. PUSHKER CHOUBISA PP — 104/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJDG010002002026

Filing Number

185/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

104/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Dungarpur District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

Sadar Dungarpur

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSHPENDRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. SH. RISHI KUMAR DAVE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - SH. PUSHKER CHOUBISA PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Dungarpur, Rajasthan granted bail to appellants Pushpendra and Vinod under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 11, 2026. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 117(2), 110, and 3(5) for allegedly assaulting a victim with an iron weapon causing serious injuries. The court found that despite the serious nature of charges, the accused had no prior criminal record, were in custody since March 9, 2026, investigation was incomplete, and prolonged custody served no purpose. Each accused was granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, with conditions to appear regularly in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Dungarpur, Rajasthan granted bail to appellants Pushpendra and Vinod under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 11, 2026. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 117(2), 110, and 3(5) for allegedly assaulting a victim with an iron weapon causing serious injuries. The court found that despite the serious nature of charges, the accused had no prior criminal record, were in custody since March 9, 2026, investigation was incomplete, and prolonged custody served no purpose. Each accused was granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, with conditions to appear regularly in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case