SOHAN URF SONU vs State — 16/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 498. Disposed: Contested--Disposed otherwise on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJDG010001972026

Filing Number

182/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Dungarpur District HQ

Judge

2-ADJ

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 498

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOHAN URF SONU

    Adv. SH. ABDUL SALAM GOURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Rajasthan court granted the accused Sohan Urf Sonu's petition for release of a confiscated mobile phone (IMEI Nos. 0864858055768010 and 86488055768002) on the condition of executing a 12,000 rupee surety bond and affidavit. The court found the applicant was the legitimate owner per the original purchase bill and since the case was disposed on 09-02-2026 with police clearance, the phone would deteriorate in police custody. The court imposed conditions that the phone must be produced in court if summoned, remain unaltered, not be sold or transferred, and the accused must submit colored photographs for court records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan court granted the accused Sohan Urf Sonu's petition for release of a confiscated mobile phone (IMEI Nos. 0864858055768010 and 86488055768002) on the condition of executing a 12,000 rupee surety bond and affidavit. The court found the applicant was the legitimate owner per the original purchase bill and since the case was disposed on 09-02-2026 with police clearance, the phone would deteriorate in police custody. The court imposed conditions that the phone must be produced in court if summoned, remain unaltered, not be sold or transferred, and the accused must submit colored photographs for court records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case