State vs Harlal Saharan Advocate - Surendra Jakhar — 828/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120B. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJCH130018112023

Filing Number

1809/2023

Filing Date

22-Nov-2019

Registration No

828/2023

Registration Date

22-Nov-2019

Court

CJM ACJM JM SARDARSHAHAR COURT COMPLEX

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Kotwali Churu

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. Prosecution

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Harlal Saharan Advocate - Surendra Jakhar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 828/2023 Court Decision The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Sadulsahar, Churu acquitted accused Harlal Singh (age 57) of all charges under IPC sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 193 dated April 10, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused forged or fabricated educational documents (10th class marksheet and certificate) or conspired with others to fraudulently contest district panchayat elections in 2015. Key Findings The court determined that: - The prosecution could not satisfactorily prove the forged nature of the documents presented during nomination filing - No credible evidence demonstrated the accused acted in criminal conspiracy with other persons - The FIR filed four years after the alleged offense (January 2015 incident, FIR January 2019) lacked reasonable justification, creating doubt about prosecution credibility - Vital documentary evidence and witness testimonies were insufficient or unreliable to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 06-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 30-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 16-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 13-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 09-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 02-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 24-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 19-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 12-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 06-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 04-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 28-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 21-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 14-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 04-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 31-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 17-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 08-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 03-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 23-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 12-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 08-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 01-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 29-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 22-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 19-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 08-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 01-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 24-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 11-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 04-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 27-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 13-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 06-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 30-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 19-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 16-May-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  51. 08-May-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  52. 03-May-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  53. 19-Apr-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  54. 04-Apr-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  55. 21-Mar-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  56. 04-Mar-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  57. 21-Feb-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  58. 10-Jan-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  59. 06-Dec-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  60. 08-Nov-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  61. 04-Oct-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  62. 30-Aug-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  63. 19-Jul-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  64. 31-May-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  65. 26-Apr-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  66. 22-Mar-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  67. 23-Feb-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  68. 19-Jan-2024

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  69. 24-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 22-Nov-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 828/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 828/2023 Court Decision The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Sadulsahar, Churu acquitted accused Harlal Singh (age 57) of all charges under IPC sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 193 dated April 10, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused forged or fabricated educational documents (10th class marksheet and certificate) or conspired with others to fraudulently contest district panchayat elections in 2015. Key Findings The court determined that: - The prosecution could not satisfactorily prove the forged nature of the documents presented during nomination filing - No credible evidence demonstrated the accused acted in criminal conspiracy with other persons - The FIR filed four years after the alleged offense (January 2015 incident, FIR January 2019) lacked reasonable justification, creating doubt about prosecution credibility - Vital documentary evidence and witness testimonies were insufficient or unreliable to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case