state vs Sattar Advocate - Sh. Sharwan singh — 470/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380ipc. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cro - Criminal Orginal

CNR: RJCH130005982015

Filing Number

1084/2015

Filing Date

01-Sep-2015

Registration No

470/2015

Registration Date

01-Sep-2015

Court

CJM ACJM JM SARDARSHAHAR COURT COMPLEX

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

G R P Police Station Sadulpur

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457,380ipc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sattar Advocate - Sh. Sharwan singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case 470/2015 Summary The court acquitted three accused—Sattar (age 31), Rustam (age 32), and Mohbub (age 31)—of theft charges under IPC sections 457 and 380. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole battery sets and an AC unit from a BSNL tower near Bhanipura village between June 29 and July 6, 2015. Critical gaps existed: no evidence that the tower was located where alleged, no recovery documentation, conflicting witness statements, and insufficient corroboration linking the accused to the theft. The court found the prosecution's case rested on suspicious circumstances rather than conclusive proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    AcknowledgmentView PDF

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 29-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 24-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 27-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 07-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 05-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 22-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 06-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 11-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 19-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 08-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 20-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 13-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 28-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 19-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 21-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 16-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 28-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 20-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 15-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 27-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 21-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 11-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 05-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 06-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 16-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 20-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 17-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 04-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 04-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 03-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 08-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 26-Oct-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 27-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 12-Dec-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 20-Jun-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  47. 20-Feb-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  48. 12-Sep-2016

    Charge

  49. 04-Feb-2016

    Charge

    Jm

  50. 12-Jan-2016

    Charge

    Jm

  51. 08-Dec-2015

    Charge

    Jm

  52. 08-Sep-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 01-Sep-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 470/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case 470/2015 Summary The court acquitted three accused—Sattar (age 31), Rustam (age 32), and Mohbub (age 31)—of theft charges under IPC sections 457 and 380. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole battery sets and an AC unit from a BSNL tower near Bhanipura village between June 29 and July 6, 2015. Critical gaps existed: no evidence that the tower was located where alleged, no recovery documentation, conflicting witness statements, and insufficient corroboration linking the accused to the theft. The court found the prosecution's case rested on suspicious circumstances rather than conclusive proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case