State vs Pappuram Advocate - Sh. manak chand bhati — 194/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
Cro - Criminal Orginal
CNR: RJCH130003812016
Filing Number
452/2016
Filing Date
25-Jun-2016
Registration No
194/2016
Registration Date
25-Jun-2016
Court
CJM ACJM JM SARDARSHAHAR COURT COMPLEX
Judge
1-Jm
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
61
Police Station
APTPS Electricity Churu
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pappuram Advocate - Sh. manak chand bhati
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Pappuram (Case 194/2016) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Pappuram on March 23, 2026, finding insufficient evidence under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving causing hurt). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that Pappuram operated the motorcycle involved in the incident, as key witnesses—including the injured party and eyewitnesses—either contradicted their police statements during cross-examination or denied witnessing the accident, and the investigator provided no identification evidence linking Pappuram to the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
19-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Jm
-
13-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm
-
19-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm
-
07-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm
-
09-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
29-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
03-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
11-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
02-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
24-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
30-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
05-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
21-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
26-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
25-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
29-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
03-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
21-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
19-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
28-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
08-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
01-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
18-May-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
27-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
22-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-Jul-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
31-Mar-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
04-Nov-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
20-Jul-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Apr-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
18-Dec-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
13-Sep-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Jun-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Apr-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Dec-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
01-Jun-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Nov-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
05-Jun-2017
Evidence
Jm
-
23-Jan-2017
Evidence
Jm
-
29-Aug-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jun-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 194/2016
Case Summary: State v. Pappuram (Case 194/2016) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Pappuram on March 23, 2026, finding insufficient evidence under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving causing hurt). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that Pappuram operated the motorcycle involved in the incident, as key witnesses—including the injured party and eyewitnesses—either contradicted their police statements during cross-examination or denied witnessing the accident, and the investigator provided no identification evidence linking Pappuram to the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts