Mohanlal etc. vs Rajendar etc. — 361/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section Interim. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 19th March 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJCH110009472024
Filing Number
947/2024
Filing Date
14-Aug-2024
Registration No
361/2024
Registration Date
14-Aug-2024
Court
CJM ACJM JM TARANAGAR COURT COMPLEX CHURU
Judge
1-Jm I
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohanlal etc.
Adv. Mukesh Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajendar etc.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm I
-
07-Mar-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
05-Mar-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
04-Mar-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
25-Feb-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
18-Feb-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
30-Jan-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
03-Jan-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
18-Dec-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
15-Dec-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
09-Dec-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
02-Dec-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
01-Dec-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
31-Oct-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
09-Oct-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
12-Aug-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
01-Jul-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
30-May-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
24-Apr-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Jm I
-
24-Feb-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm I
-
15-Jan-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm I
-
03-Dec-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm I
-
03-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 361/2024
SUMMARY The Judicial Magistrate rejected the interim maintenance petition filed by elderly parents (Mohanlal, 69, and Girdawri, 63) against their sons (Rajendra and Mahendra). The court found that the parents possess sufficient agricultural land (1/3 share retained for themselves) generating adequate income, and noted pending revenue disputes between parties, making interim maintenance unjustified at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts