Mangi lal Represented by Power of Attorney - Radhashyam S% baluram soni RES-sujangarh vs Badriprasad — 171/2014
Status: Awaiting Services of notices/ summons. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
Civil Exe - Civil Execution
CNR: RJCH100000312014
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
1223/2014
Filing Date
27-01-2014
Registration No
171/2014
Registration Date
17-02-2014
Court
CJ CIVIL CASES SUJANGARH COURT COMPLEX
Judge
3-JM
Petitioner(s)
Mangi lal Represented by Power of Attorney - Radhashyam S% baluram soni RES-sujangarh
Adv. surender kumar
Respondent(s)
Badriprasad
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JM
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 19-05-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 11-05-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 04-05-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 27-04-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY In this execution petition (E.D. 02/2014) filed by Mangi Lal against Badri Prasad, the court dismissed the execution proceedings against Respondent No. 2 (Bhola Ram) dated 26.04.2023. The court found that no decree was passed against Bhola Ram in the underlying suit (Case No. 135/2010), as he was never a party to the original case and only later sought to become a party through an application. Since no judgment or decree exists against Bhola Ram, the court held that execution proceedings against him cannot be maintained and therefore terminated the execution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY In this execution petition (E.D. 02/2014) filed by Mangi Lal against Badri Prasad, the court dismissed the execution proceedings against Respondent No. 2 (Bhola Ram) dated 26.04.2023. The court found that no decree was passed against Bhola Ram in the underlying suit (Case No. 135/2010), as he was never a party to the original case and only later sought to become a party through an application. Since no judgment or decree exists against Bhola Ram, the court held that execution proceedings against him cannot be maintained and therefore terminated the execution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts