Karan urf karni urf lodiya vs State Advocate - Addl. P.P. — 56/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJCH060002232026
Filing Number
105/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ RAJGARH COURT COMPLEX CHURU
Judge
1-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
418
Police Station
Rajgarh
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karan urf karni urf lodiya
Adv. Vikram Singh
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - Addl. P.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to petitioner Karan Urf Karni Urf Lodiya under Section 483 CrPC, who had been arrested for non-appearance in Case No. 17/2025 on 08.01.2026. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his absence was due to genuine hardship and considered his family circumstances, noting he complied with the bail conditions and appeared in court on 09.03.2026. Bail was granted on conditions of depositing ₹50,000 as personal bond and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to petitioner Karan Urf Karni Urf Lodiya under Section 483 CrPC, who had been arrested for non-appearance in Case No. 17/2025 on 08.01.2026. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his absence was due to genuine hardship and considered his family circumstances, noting he complied with the bail conditions and appeared in court on 09.03.2026. Bail was granted on conditions of depositing ₹50,000 as personal bond and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts