Karan urf karni urf lodiya vs State Advocate - Addl. P.P. — 56/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJCH060002232026

Filing Number

105/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

56/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ RAJGARH COURT COMPLEX CHURU

Judge

1-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

418

Police Station

Rajgarh

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

1.Karan urf karni urf lodiya

Adv. Vikram Singh

Respondent(s)

1.State Advocate - Addl. P.P.

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
16-Mar-2026

Copy of JudgementView PDF

The court granted bail to petitioner Karan Urf Karni Urf Lodiya under Section 483 CrPC, who had been arrested for non-appearance in Case No. 17/2025 on 08.01.2026. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his absence was due to genuine hardship and considered his family circumstances, noting he complied with the bail conditions and appeared in court on 09.03.2026. Bail was granted on conditions of depositing ₹50,000 as personal bond and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
16-Mar-2026

Disposed

Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
13-Mar-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
11-Mar-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 56/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to petitioner Karan Urf Karni Urf Lodiya under Section 483 CrPC, who had been arrested for non-appearance in Case No. 17/2025 on 08.01.2026. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his absence was due to genuine hardship and considered his family circumstances, noting he complied with the bail conditions and appeared in court on 09.03.2026. Bail was granted on conditions of depositing ₹50,000 as personal bond and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.