Mohammad Imran vs Yusuf — 154/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJCH020020452024

Filing Number

2045/2024

Filing Date

30-Jul-2024

Registration No

154/2024

Registration Date

30-Jul-2024

Court

CJM ACJM JM DISTRCIT HQ CHURU

Judge

3-Sr Civil Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

184

Police Station

Kotwali Churu

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammad Imran

    Adv. Addl. P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yusuf

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sr Civil Judge

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sr Civil Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  10. 27-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  11. 30-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  12. 16-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  13. 13-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  14. 09-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  15. 21-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  16. 22-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 30-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 154/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu rejected the complainant Mohammad Imran's protest petition against the police's "A-form" (final report of no crime) in an FIR under Section 406 IPC. The court found that the dispute between Imran and Yusef regarding money transactions in their partnership business was governed by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, not criminal law, as there was insufficient evidence of criminal breach of trust or cheating with dishonest intent from the outset. The court upheld the investigation officer's conclusion that no cognizable offense occurred and dismissed Imran's protest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case