State vs Sanwarmal Advocate - Aseem Khan — 537/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,325. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJCH020014252017

Filing Number

1418/2017

Filing Date

25-Aug-2017

Registration No

537/2017

Registration Date

25-Aug-2017

Court

CJM ACJM JM DISTRCIT HQ CHURU

Judge

3-Sr Civil Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

239

Police Station

Kotwali Churu

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,325

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanwarmal Advocate - Aseem Khan

  2. 2.Suresh kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Sanwarmal Advocate et al. (Case 537/2017) Court Decision (Judgment Date: 23.03.2026): The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu (Rajasthan) convicted both accused—Sanwarmal (age 38) and Suresh Kumar (age 32)—under IPC Sections 323 and 325 (voluntarily causing hurt and grievous injury). The court found them guilty of assaulting the complainant Sitaram and victim Girish Ojha on 14.10.2016 at Butiya Mod, Churu, causing injuries to both victims. Sentence: Both accused were granted the benefit of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act on condition of good behavior for one year, with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each. Additionally, each was fined Rs. 2,500 (total Rs. 5,000 for prosecution expenses), and ordered to pay Rs. 2,500 compensation to each victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sr Civil Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Sr Civil Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Sr Civil Judge

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  7. 16-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  8. 14-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  9. 13-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  10. 03-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  11. 10-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  12. 06-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  13. 24-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  14. 09-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  15. 08-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  16. 28-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  17. 27-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  18. 10-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  19. 09-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  20. 26-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  21. 25-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  22. 24-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  23. 30-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  24. 03-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  25. 27-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  26. 17-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  27. 20-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  28. 07-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sr Civil Judge

  29. 30-May-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  30. 16-May-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  31. 24-Jan-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  32. 08-Sep-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  33. 19-Jun-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  34. 15-Feb-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  35. 15-Oct-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  36. 30-May-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  37. 07-Feb-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  38. 05-Oct-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  39. 02-Aug-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  40. 03-May-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  41. 01-Feb-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  42. 20-Nov-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  43. 31-Jul-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  44. 23-May-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  45. 06-Mar-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Sr Civil Judge

  46. 30-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 25-Aug-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 537/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Sanwarmal Advocate et al. (Case 537/2017) Court Decision (Judgment Date: 23.03.2026): The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu (Rajasthan) convicted both accused—Sanwarmal (age 38) and Suresh Kumar (age 32)—under IPC Sections 323 and 325 (voluntarily causing hurt and grievous injury). The court found them guilty of assaulting the complainant Sitaram and victim Girish Ojha on 14.10.2016 at Butiya Mod, Churu, causing injuries to both victims. Sentence: Both accused were granted the benefit of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act on condition of good behavior for one year, with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each. Additionally, each was fined Rs. 2,500 (total Rs. 5,000 for prosecution expenses), and ordered to pay Rs. 2,500 compensation to each victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case