Bismilla Bano vs Nathi Advocate - Mahiman Joshi — 28/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 09th March 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJCH010017252023
Filing Number
267/2023
Filing Date
02-Nov-2023
Registration No
28/2023
Registration Date
17-Nov-2023
Court
DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed after Full Trial
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bismilla Bano
Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat
-
2.Nawab Ali
Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat
-
3.Mohammad Rafik s
Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat
-
4.Mohammad Jameel
Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nathi Advocate - Mahiman Joshi
-
2.Mohammad Rafik
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
-
3.Roshan Ali
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
-
4.Sikandar ali
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
-
5.Mohammad Munshi
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
-
6.Mohammad Salim
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jan-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Final arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
31-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
Written Statement
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-May-2024
Written Statement
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-May-2024
Written Statement
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2024
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jan-2024
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 28/2023
Case Summary The District Court of Churu, Rajasthan granted the plaintiffs' petition for partition of ancestral undivided property. The court held that the plaintiffs, as legal heirs of the deceased Eid Mohammad, are entitled to partition their 1/4 share of the residential land by metes and bounds. The court found that the daughters' prior waiver of their inheritance rights (documented in a 2012 agreement) did not require formal registration under Muslim law exceptions, and therefore other heirs need not be made parties to the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts