Bismilla Bano vs Nathi Advocate - Mahiman Joshi — 28/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 09th March 2026.

Civil Suit

CNR: RJCH010017252023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

267/2023

Filing Date

02-11-2023

Registration No

28/2023

Registration Date

17-11-2023

Court

DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7

Petitioner(s)

Bismilla Bano

Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat

Nawab Ali

Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat

Mohammad Rafik s

Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat

Mohammad Jameel

Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat

Respondent(s)

Nathi Advocate - Mahiman Joshi

Mohammad Rafik

Adv. Mahiman Joshi

Roshan Ali

Adv. Mahiman Joshi

Sikandar ali

Adv. Mahiman Joshi

Mohammad Munshi

Adv. Mahiman Joshi

Mohammad Salim

Adv. Mahiman Joshi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Final arguments

23-02-2026

Final arguments

17-02-2026

Final arguments

13-02-2026

Final arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Judgement
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District Court of Churu, Rajasthan granted the plaintiffs' petition for partition of ancestral undivided property. The court held that the plaintiffs, as legal heirs of the deceased Eid Mohammad, are entitled to partition their 1/4 share of the residential land by metes and bounds. The court found that the daughters' prior waiver of their inheritance rights (documented in a 2012 agreement) did not require formal registration under Muslim law exceptions, and therefore other heirs need not be made parties to the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case