Bismilla Bano vs Nathi Advocate - Mahiman Joshi — 28/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 09th March 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJCH010017252023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
267/2023
Filing Date
02-11-2023
Registration No
28/2023
Registration Date
17-11-2023
Court
DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed after Full Trial
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bismilla Bano
Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat
Nawab Ali
Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat
Mohammad Rafik s
Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat
Mohammad Jameel
Adv. Vijay Singh Shekhawat
Respondent(s)
Nathi Advocate - Mahiman Joshi
Mohammad Rafik
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
Roshan Ali
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
Sikandar ali
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
Mohammad Munshi
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
Mohammad Salim
Adv. Mahiman Joshi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 23-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 17-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 13-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The District Court of Churu, Rajasthan granted the plaintiffs' petition for partition of ancestral undivided property. The court held that the plaintiffs, as legal heirs of the deceased Eid Mohammad, are entitled to partition their 1/4 share of the residential land by metes and bounds. The court found that the daughters' prior waiver of their inheritance rights (documented in a 2012 agreement) did not require formal registration under Muslim law exceptions, and therefore other heirs need not be made parties to the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts