State vs Parmod Kumar Advocate - Babu Lal Saini — 108/2025

Case under Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act Section 3,7,11,14. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJCH010010162025

Filing Number

861/2025

Filing Date

29-Sep-2025

Registration No

108/2025

Registration Date

29-Sep-2025

Court

DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

223

Police Station

Ratangarh

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act Section 3,7,11,14
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 79
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 146

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parmod Kumar Advocate - Babu Lal Saini

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Juvenile Court in Churu, Rajasthan acquitted Prmod Kumar of child labor charges on March 7, 2026, due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was employing the minor boy Sanil at his vegetable shop, citing critical gaps including the accused's absence during the police raid, lack of shop ownership documentation, and the alleged victim's complete denial in court. The court noted the absence of independent witnesses despite the incident occurring in a crowded market area, and found the videographic evidence unreliable due to inadequate procedural compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case