State vs Sitaram — 88/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJCH010009752025

Filing Number

825/2025

Filing Date

18-Sep-2025

Registration No

88/2025

Registration Date

20-Sep-2025

Court

DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

340

Police Station

Kotwali Churu

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sitaram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 88/2025 Court: Session Court, Churu (Rajasthan) Parties: State (Appellant) vs. Sitaram (Respondent) Decision: The appellate court REJECTED the State's criminal appeal and UPHELD the acquittal of Sitaram. The trial court had acquitted Sitaram of charges under IPC Sections 332, 353/34 (voluntarily causing hurt to public servants) and Section 3 of the Public Property Protection Act. The court found insufficient, contradictory evidence and material gaps (missing injury reports, no logbook seizure, inconsistent witness statements) to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, ruling the prosecution failed to prove its case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 88/2025 Court: Session Court, Churu (Rajasthan) Parties: State (Appellant) vs. Sitaram (Respondent) Decision: The appellate court REJECTED the State's criminal appeal and UPHELD the acquittal of Sitaram. The trial court had acquitted Sitaram of charges under IPC Sections 332, 353/34 (voluntarily causing hurt to public servants) and Section 3 of the Public Property Protection Act. The court found insufficient, contradictory evidence and material gaps (missing injury reports, no logbook seizure, inconsistent witness statements) to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, ruling the prosecution failed to prove its case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case