State vs Sukhpreet Singh Advocate - Narendra Sharma — 12/2025

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,15. Disposed: Uncontested--Convicted on Plead Guilty / Plea Bargaining on 02nd May 2026.

Session Case

CNR: RJCH010008932025

Case disposed

Filing Number

752/2025

Filing Date

30-08-2025

Registration No

12/2025

Registration Date

01-09-2025

Court

DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU

Judge

2-ADJ

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Convicted on Plead Guilty / Plea Bargaining

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

Ratannagar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,15

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. Addl. P.P.

Respondent(s)

Sukhpreet Singh Advocate - Narendra Sharma

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ

02-05-2026

Disposed

01-05-2026

Prosecution Evidence

13-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

17-01-2026

Prosecution Evidence

17-11-2025

Hearing arguments on Charge

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
Judgement

Case 12/2025 Summary Sukhpreet Singh, age 42, was convicted under Sections 8/15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for possessing 2 kg 240 grams of poppy husk—just above the 1,000-gram "small quantity" threshold. The court imposed a lenient sentence of 10 days rigorous imprisonment and ₹2,500 fine, crediting his prolonged detention since 2025 and voluntary confession before the court. The court adopted a sympathetic approach citing the Supreme Court precedent in *Haripadas v. State of West Bengal* regarding long trial delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 12/2025 Summary Sukhpreet Singh, age 42, was convicted under Sections 8/15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for possessing 2 kg 240 grams of poppy husk—just above the 1,000-gram "small quantity" threshold. The court imposed a lenient sentence of 10 days rigorous imprisonment and ₹2,500 fine, crediting his prolonged detention since 2025 and voluntary confession before the court. The court adopted a sympathetic approach citing the Supreme Court precedent in *Haripadas v. State of West Bengal* regarding long trial delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case