State vs Sukhpreet Singh Advocate - Narendra Sharma — 12/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,15. Disposed: Uncontested--Convicted on Plead Guilty / Plea Bargaining on 02nd May 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJCH010008932025
Filing Number
752/2025
Filing Date
30-Aug-2025
Registration No
12/2025
Registration Date
01-Sep-2025
Court
DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU
Judge
2-ADJ
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Convicted on Plead Guilty / Plea Bargaining
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
Ratannagar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. Addl. P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sukhpreet Singh Advocate - Narendra Sharma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case 12/2025 Summary Sukhpreet Singh, age 42, was convicted under Sections 8/15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for possessing 2 kg 240 grams of poppy husk—just above the 1,000-gram "small quantity" threshold. The court imposed a lenient sentence of 10 days rigorous imprisonment and ₹2,500 fine, crediting his prolonged detention since 2025 and voluntary confession before the court. The court adopted a sympathetic approach citing the Supreme Court precedent in *Haripadas v. State of West Bengal* regarding long trial delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
ADJ
-
01-May-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ
-
13-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ
-
17-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ
-
17-Nov-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
ADJ
-
17-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2025
Case 12/2025 Summary Sukhpreet Singh, age 42, was convicted under Sections 8/15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for possessing 2 kg 240 grams of poppy husk—just above the 1,000-gram "small quantity" threshold. The court imposed a lenient sentence of 10 days rigorous imprisonment and ₹2,500 fine, crediting his prolonged detention since 2025 and voluntary confession before the court. The court adopted a sympathetic approach citing the Supreme Court precedent in *Haripadas v. State of West Bengal* regarding long trial delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts