Bhanwar Lal vs State Advocate - P.P. — 40/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 15th May 2026.
Cr. Revision
CNR: RJCH010006102023
Filing Number
495/2023
Filing Date
18-04-2023
Registration No
40/2023
Registration Date
02-05-2023
Court
DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
FIR Details
FIR Number
260
Police Station
Kotwali Churu
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhanwar Lal
Adv. Anand Kumar Saini
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - P.P.
DINESH KUMAR
Adv. Pawan Kumar Sharma
VASUDEVI
Adv. Pawan Kumar Sharma
ASHOK KUMAR
Adv. Pawan Kumar Sharma
PRADEEP SHARMA
Adv. Pawan Kumar Sharma
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | Orders |
| 22-04-2026 | Orders |
| 10-04-2026 | Orders |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 40/2023: Bhanwar Lal v. State Advocate The Session Court, Churu rejected Bhanwar Lal's petition challenging the lower court's acceptance of a "final report" (FIR closure) in a property dispute case. The petitioner alleged that documents showing cancellation of his power of attorney were forged and that accused persons fraudulently transferred property using fake documents. The court upheld the lower court's findings, determining that the power of attorney was validly cancelled with proper notice, and that no prima facie case of fraud (IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B) existed, as the matter primarily involved civil property rights rather than criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 40/2023: Bhanwar Lal v. State Advocate The Session Court, Churu rejected Bhanwar Lal's petition challenging the lower court's acceptance of a "final report" (FIR closure) in a property dispute case. The petitioner alleged that documents showing cancellation of his power of attorney were forged and that accused persons fraudulently transferred property using fake documents. The court upheld the lower court's findings, determining that the power of attorney was validly cancelled with proper notice, and that no prima facie case of fraud (IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B) existed, as the matter primarily involved civil property rights rather than criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts