State vs Krishan Kumar Advocate - Vinod Kumar Danewa — 60/2023
Case under Drugs and Cosmetics Act Section 18(c), 18a, 22(1) (cca),27(b)(ii), 28, 22(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.
Complaint
CNR: RJCH010005432023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
433/2023
Filing Date
29-03-2023
Registration No
60/2023
Registration Date
15-04-2023
Court
DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. P.P.
Respondent(s)
Krishan Kumar Advocate - Vinod Kumar Danewa
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgment
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 25-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 18-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 13-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary Court: Special Court (Drugs & Cosmetics Act), Churu, Rajasthan Decision: The accused Krishna Kumar was acquitted of charges under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 (Sections 18C read with 27(B)(II), 18A read with 28, and 22(1)(cca) read with 22(3)). Key Reasoning: The court found multiple procedural and evidentiary deficiencies undermining the prosecution's case: the original complaint was not produced on record; independent witnesses were absent; the informant had commercial rivalry with the accused; only 3 of 58 seized drugs were sampled and tested; and documentary evidence showed alterations and cutting marks. These cumulative factors prevented the prosecution from proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts