State vs Krishan Kumar Advocate - Vinod Kumar Danewa — 60/2023

Case under Drugs and Cosmetics Act Section 18(c), 18a, 22(1) (cca),27(b)(ii), 28, 22(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.

Complaint

CNR: RJCH010005432023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

433/2023

Filing Date

29-03-2023

Registration No

60/2023

Registration Date

15-04-2023

Court

DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

Drugs and Cosmetics Act Section 18(c), 18a, 22(1) (cca),27(b)(ii), 28, 22(3)

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. P.P.

Respondent(s)

Krishan Kumar Advocate - Vinod Kumar Danewa

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Judgment

25-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

18-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

13-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Judgement
casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary Court: Special Court (Drugs & Cosmetics Act), Churu, Rajasthan Decision: The accused Krishna Kumar was acquitted of charges under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 (Sections 18C read with 27(B)(II), 18A read with 28, and 22(1)(cca) read with 22(3)). Key Reasoning: The court found multiple procedural and evidentiary deficiencies undermining the prosecution's case: the original complaint was not produced on record; independent witnesses were absent; the informant had commercial rivalry with the accused; only 3 of 58 seized drugs were sampled and tested; and documentary evidence showed alterations and cutting marks. These cumulative factors prevented the prosecution from proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case