Mohammad Sameer vs State Advocate - P.P. — 10/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 13th March 2026.
Cr. Revision
CNR: RJCH010001092026
Filing Number
84/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
FIR Details
FIR Number
374
Police Station
Kotwali Churu
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammad Sameer
Adv. Abdul Gaffar
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - P.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Mohammad Sameer v. State Advocate (Case 10/2026) The Sessions Court, Churu dismissed Mohammad Sameer's petition challenging the trial court's refusal to renew his expired passport. The court held that permitting passport renewal would risk delaying proceedings in the underlying criminal case (Case 573/2021), where Sameer faces charges under IPC sections 147, 452, 341, 323, 325 (rioting, criminal intimidation, and causing hurt). Eight of sixteen witnesses have testified; eight remain pending. The court found no legal error in the trial court's decision to deny renewal pending case resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mohammad Sameer v. State Advocate (Case 10/2026) The Sessions Court, Churu dismissed Mohammad Sameer's petition challenging the trial court's refusal to renew his expired passport. The court held that permitting passport renewal would risk delaying proceedings in the underlying criminal case (Case 573/2021), where Sameer faces charges under IPC sections 147, 452, 341, 323, 325 (rioting, criminal intimidation, and causing hurt). Eight of sixteen witnesses have testified; eight remain pending. The court found no legal error in the trial court's decision to deny renewal pending case resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts