state vs bhanwar lal — 2/2026

Case under Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance 1949 Section 13. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBW220000082026

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

Gram Nyayalay Mandal Criminal Cases

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari Gram Nyayalaya Mandal

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

380

Police Station

mandal

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance 1949 Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.bhanwar lal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Nyayadhikari Gram Nyayalaya Mandal

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari Gram Nyayalaya Mandal

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari Gram Nyayalaya Mandal

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari Gram Nyayalaya Mandal

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari Gram Nyayalaya Mandal

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari Gram Nyayalaya Mandal

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court convicted Bhavarlal (age 48) under Section 13 of the Rajasthan Prevention of Gambling Act (RPGA) for operating an illegal gambling operation in a public place on December 10, 2025. The prosecution proved through eyewitness testimony that the accused was found writing betting slips and possessed gambling materials (betting slips, pen) and ₹130 in cash without any license. Rather than imposing jail time, the court granted the accused the benefit of the Probation Act due to it being his first offense, admonishing him with a warning and ordering him to pay ₹100 as court costs, while confiscating the gambling materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case