State Government vs kalyan Advocate - SARVAN LAL — 9/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 435,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
Cr - criminal
CNR: RJBW170001922016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
192/2016
Filing Date
14-01-2016
Registration No
9/2016
Registration Date
14-01-2016
Court
ACJM JM Mandal Court Criminal Cases
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
372
Police Station
Mandal Police Station
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
kalyan Advocate - SARVAN LAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 10-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 07-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 25-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary State v. Kalyan and Mahadev (Criminal Case No. 09/2016) The court acquitted accused Mahadev of charges under IPC Section 435 (arson) due to significant contradictions in prosecution witnesses' testimonies. While the complainant's wife (Badaam) claimed to have witnessed the accused set fire to fodder stored in a barn on November 23, 2015, another witness (Savariya) testified that Badaam was absent at the time and that the fire resulted from unattended cooking embers. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt given these irreconcilable discrepancies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts