Suresh Chandra Suthar vs Arjun Advocate - mukesh jain — 91/2017
Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 19th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBW170000922017
Filing Number
92/2017
Filing Date
08-Mar-2017
Registration No
91/2017
Registration Date
08-Mar-2017
Court
ACJM JM Mandal Court Criminal Cases
Judge
2-Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Suresh Chandra Suthar
Adv. yatindra choudhary
Respondent(s)
-
1.Arjun Advocate - mukesh jain
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
07-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
05-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
12-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
05-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
22-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
15-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
08-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
18-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
11-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
04-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
20-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
06-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
16-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
31-Jul-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
19-Jun-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
20-Mar-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
19-Dec-2024
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
17-Oct-2024
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
29-Aug-2024
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
06-Jun-2024
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
21-Mar-2024
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
11-Jan-2024
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
05-Oct-2023
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
06-Jul-2023
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
06-Apr-2023
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
19-Jan-2023
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
24-Nov-2022
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
22-Sep-2022
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
15-Sep-2022
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
13-Sep-2022
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
18-Aug-2022
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
10-Mar-2022
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
02-Dec-2021
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate, Mandal
-
08-Sep-2021
Defence Evidence
-
16-Jun-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
-
22-Apr-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
-
10-Dec-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
-
03-Sep-2020
Prosecution Evidence
-
02-Jul-2020
Prosecution Evidence
-
16-Apr-2020
Prosecution Evidence
-
09-Jan-2020
Prosecution Evidence
-
17-Oct-2019
Prosecution Evidence
-
09-Aug-2019
Prosecution Evidence
-
28-Jun-2019
Prosecution Evidence
-
26-Apr-2019
Prosecution Evidence
-
18-Jan-2019
Prosecution Evidence
-
02-Nov-2018
Prosecution Evidence
-
04-Oct-2018
Prosecution Evidence
-
06-Sep-2018
Prosecution Evidence
-
10-Aug-2018
Prosecution Evidence
-
06-Jul-2018
Prosecution Evidence
-
25-May-2018
Prosecution Evidence
-
30-Mar-2018
Prosecution Evidence
-
19-Jan-2018
Prosecution Evidence
-
24-Nov-2017
Prosecution Evidence
-
13-Oct-2017
Summons
-
28-Aug-2017
Summons
-
06-Jun-2017
Summons
-
17-Apr-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Mar-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2017
SUMMARY: The court convicted Arjun under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding that he issued a cheque for ₹85,000 to Suresh Chandra to repay a loan but the cheque bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal notice within the statutory period, Arjun failed to make payment. The court rejected his defense that the cheque was security for vehicle financing, as he produced no supporting documentation and made contradictory statements. The court sentenced him to one year imprisonment and ordered him to pay ₹1,50,000 as compensation to the complainant, with an additional month of imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts