State vs Smt chandrakalan — 163/2016

Case under Excise (Spirits) Act Section 16,54. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cro

CNR: RJBW160003622016

Filing Number

278/2016

Filing Date

17-Oct-2016

Registration No

163/2016

Registration Date

17-Oct-2016

Court

JM Jahazpur Criminal And Civil Cases

Judge

1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

160

Police Station

JAHAZPUR

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Excise (Spirits) Act Section 16,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt chandrakalan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  10. 14-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  11. 17-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  12. 17-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  14. 23-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  15. 25-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  16. 07-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  17. 09-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  18. 22-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  19. 13-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  20. 18-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  21. 16-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  22. 16-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  23. 15-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  24. 15-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  25. 04-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  26. 28-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  27. 21-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  28. 06-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  29. 18-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  30. 17-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  31. 17-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  32. 28-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  33. 12-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  34. 22-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  35. 12-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  36. 06-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  37. 13-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  38. 22-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  39. 16-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  40. 20-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  41. 28-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  42. 04-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  43. 07-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  44. 17-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  45. 03-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahazpur

  46. 25-Apr-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

  47. 13-Feb-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

  48. 17-Dec-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

  49. 16-Oct-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

  50. 01-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

  51. 29-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

  52. 05-Apr-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  53. 06-Feb-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  54. 01-Dec-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    District Judge

  55. 27-Sep-2017

    Evidence

    District Judge

  56. 18-Aug-2017

    Evidence

    District Judge

  57. 03-Aug-2017

    Evidence

    District Judge

  58. 24-Jul-2017

    Evidence

    District Judge

  59. 15-Jun-2017

    Evidence

    District Judge

  60. 21-Apr-2017

    Evidence

    District Judge

  61. 08-Feb-2017

    Charge

    District Judge

  62. 01-Dec-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 17-Oct-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted Chandrakala (age 28) of charges under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for allegedly transporting 3 liters of illegal liquor. The judgment found critical inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence: witness testimonies contradicted each other regarding where the seizure and arrest occurred (at the scene vs. at the police station), when the sample was extracted, and even the date of the incident (April vs. June 2016). The court held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to these material contradictions in documentary and oral evidence, and consequently granted the accused the benefit of doubt and acquitted her. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case