State vs Ram Nath Advocate - ashok goyal — 433/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
Cr.reg - Criminal Regular
CNR: RJBR130007142016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
799/2016
Filing Date
16-12-2016
Registration No
433/2016
Registration Date
16-12-2016
Court
JM Kishanganj Taluka
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
138
Police Station
Bhanvargarh Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
Ram Nath Advocate - ashok goyal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 26-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 06-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 24-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted accused Ramnath of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt), and 304(a) (causing death by negligence) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution established that a car accident occurred on November 1, 2016, resulting in one death and injuries to others, the court found that no witness could identify the vehicle's registration number or confirm who was driving, making it impossible to prove the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted accused Ramnath of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt), and 304(a) (causing death by negligence) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution established that a car accident occurred on November 1, 2016, resulting in one death and injuries to others, the court found that no witness could identify the vehicle's registration number or confirm who was driving, making it impossible to prove the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts