State vs Ram Nath Advocate - ashok goyal — 433/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.reg - Criminal Regular

CNR: RJBR130007142016

Filing Number

799/2016

Filing Date

16-Dec-2016

Registration No

433/2016

Registration Date

16-Dec-2016

Court

JM Kishanganj Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

138

Police Station

Bhanvargarh Police Station

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. apo

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ram Nath Advocate - ashok goyal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted accused Ramnath of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt), and 304(a) (causing death by negligence) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution established that a car accident occurred on November 1, 2016, resulting in one death and injuries to others, the court found that no witness could identify the vehicle's registration number or confirm who was driving, making it impossible to prove the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 03-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 27-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 18-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 22-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 14-Feb-2025

    Orders

    Jm

  14. 16-Dec-2024

    Orders

    Jm

  15. 19-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Jm

  16. 17-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Jm

  17. 17-Oct-2024

    Restored

    Jm

  18. 17-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Jm

  19. 10-Sep-2024

    Disposed

    Jm

  20. 21-Aug-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  21. 11-Jul-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  22. 06-Apr-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  23. 04-Jan-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  24. 27-Oct-2023

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Jm

  25. 10-Aug-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  26. 23-May-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  27. 08-Mar-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  28. 02-Dec-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  29. 22-Sep-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  30. 08-Jun-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  31. 30-Mar-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  32. 19-Jan-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  33. 10-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 06-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 24-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

  36. 05-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 07-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 02-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 06-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 17-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 05-Apr-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 06-Dec-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 18-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 17-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 02-Jul-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 27-Mar-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  47. 14-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  48. 04-Sep-2017

    Jm

  49. 13-Jun-2017

    Jm

  50. 28-Mar-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 16-Dec-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 433/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted accused Ramnath of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt), and 304(a) (causing death by negligence) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution established that a car accident occurred on November 1, 2016, resulting in one death and injuries to others, the court found that no witness could identify the vehicle's registration number or confirm who was driving, making it impossible to prove the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case