State vs Ravi prakash Advocate - M.I.Khan — 2/2016

Case under Arms Act Section 4,25. Disposed: Uncontested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 10th March 2026.

Arms Act - Rajasthan Arms Act

CNR: RJBR130006242016

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

709/2016

Filing Date

02-12-2016

Registration No

2/2016

Registration Date

02-12-2016

Court

JM Kishanganj Taluka

Judge

1-JM

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Convicted and Released on Probation

FIR Details

FIR Number

165

Police Station

Nahargarh Police Station

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 4,25

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

Ravi prakash Advocate - M.I.Khan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JM

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Service of Non-bailable warrant

04-02-2026

Service of Non-bailable warrant

27-01-2026

Service of Non-bailable warrant

28-11-2025

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order

The Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Raviprakash under Section 4/25 of the Ayush Act based on his voluntary confession. However, considering that the accused is poor, this is his first offense, he has no prior criminal conviction, and he voluntarily confessed in the spirit of Lok Adalat, the court sentenced him to probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 for one year with a bond of Rs. 10,000, rather than imposing imprisonment. The court also imposed prosecution costs of Rs. 50 on the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Raviprakash under Section 4/25 of the Ayush Act based on his voluntary confession. However, considering that the accused is poor, this is his first offense, he has no prior criminal conviction, and he voluntarily confessed in the spirit of Lok Adalat, the court sentenced him to probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 for one year with a bond of Rs. 10,000, rather than imposing imprisonment. The court also imposed prosecution costs of Rs. 50 on the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JM Kishanganj Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case