state of rajasthan vs Ram karan Etc Advocate - Ashok Goyal — 323/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,354/34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.reg - Criminal Regular

CNR: RJBR130005682016

Filing Number

653/2016

Filing Date

03-Nov-2016

Registration No

323/2016

Registration Date

03-Nov-2016

Court

JM Kishanganj Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

114

Police Station

Kishanganj Police Station

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,354/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state of rajasthan

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ram karan Etc Advocate - Ashok Goyal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary The court acquitted accused Ramkaran and Babloo of charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) read with Section 34 (common intention) due to insufficient evidence and contradictions in witness testimonies. While the complainant's account in her FIR differed from her court statements regarding whether the accused tore the victim's clothes, no witness directly testified to this act, and the documentary evidence lacked corroboration, leading the court to grant the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  11. 20-Sep-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  12. 06-Aug-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  13. 17-Jul-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  14. 26-Jun-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  15. 04-Jun-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  16. 26-May-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  17. 07-May-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  18. 22-Apr-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  19. 06-Mar-2025

    Final arguments

    Jm

  20. 25-Feb-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  21. 12-Feb-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  22. 24-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 05-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 26-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 03-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 03-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 06-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 09-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 05-Mar-2024

    Orders

    Jm

  30. 12-Feb-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  31. 07-Oct-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  32. 22-Jun-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  33. 30-Jan-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  34. 15-Oct-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  35. 26-Jul-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  36. 04-May-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  37. 15-Dec-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  38. 25-Oct-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  39. 23-Mar-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

  40. 07-Sep-2020

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  41. 05-Mar-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  42. 04-Oct-2019

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  43. 06-Aug-2019

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  44. 08-Jul-2019

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  45. 15-Jun-2019

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  46. 29-May-2019

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  47. 12-Apr-2019

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  48. 09-Mar-2019

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  49. 17-Dec-2018

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  50. 27-Nov-2018

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  51. 01-Oct-2018

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  52. 01-Sep-2018

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  53. 03-Aug-2018

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  54. 12-Jul-2018

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  55. 14-May-2018

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  56. 12-Apr-2018

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  57. 23-Feb-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  58. 20-Dec-2017

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  59. 06-Nov-2017

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  60. 21-Aug-2017

    Charge

    Jm

  61. 11-Jul-2017

    Charge

    Jm

  62. 15-May-2017

    Charge

    Jm

  63. 01-Apr-2017

    Charge

    Jm

  64. 10-Mar-2017

    Charge

    Jm

  65. 03-Feb-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  66. 03-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 323/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted accused Ramkaran and Babloo of charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) read with Section 34 (common intention) due to insufficient evidence and contradictions in witness testimonies. While the complainant's account in her FIR differed from her court statements regarding whether the accused tore the victim's clothes, no witness directly testified to this act, and the documentary evidence lacked corroboration, leading the court to grant the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case