state of rajasthan vs Ram karan Etc Advocate - Ashok Goyal — 323/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,354/34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
Cr.reg - Criminal Regular
CNR: RJBR130005682016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
653/2016
Filing Date
03-11-2016
Registration No
323/2016
Registration Date
03-11-2016
Court
JM Kishanganj Taluka
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
114
Police Station
Kishanganj Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state of rajasthan
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Ram karan Etc Advocate - Ashok Goyal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 25-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 04-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court acquitted accused Ramkaran and Babloo of charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) read with Section 34 (common intention) due to insufficient evidence and contradictions in witness testimonies. While the complainant's account in her FIR differed from her court statements regarding whether the accused tore the victim's clothes, no witness directly testified to this act, and the documentary evidence lacked corroboration, leading the court to grant the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court acquitted accused Ramkaran and Babloo of charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) read with Section 34 (common intention) due to insufficient evidence and contradictions in witness testimonies. While the complainant's account in her FIR differed from her court statements regarding whether the accused tore the victim's clothes, no witness directly testified to this act, and the documentary evidence lacked corroboration, leading the court to grant the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts