State vs SHAYM @ RADHESHYAM — 187/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354,457. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBR130002882023

Filing Number

288/2023

Filing Date

24-Apr-2023

Registration No

187/2023

Registration Date

24-Apr-2023

Court

JM Kishanganj Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

250

Police Station

Kishanganj Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354,457

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAYM @ RADHESHYAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The court acquitted accused Shyam (Radheshyam) of charges under IPC Sections 354 (indecent assault) and 457 (house-breaking) due to lack of evidence, while convicting him for Section 341 (wrongful restraint) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) under a prior compromise between parties. The court found that all prosecution witnesses contradicted the allegations and admitted to a settlement, making the evidence insufficient to prove the more serious charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  5. 02-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  6. 12-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 27-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 21-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 28-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 06-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 04-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 05-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 24-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted accused Shyam (Radheshyam) of charges under IPC Sections 354 (indecent assault) and 457 (house-breaking) due to lack of evidence, while convicting him for Section 341 (wrongful restraint) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) under a prior compromise between parties. The court found that all prosecution witnesses contradicted the allegations and admitted to a settlement, making the evidence insufficient to prove the more serious charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case