state of rajasthan vs Vinod etc Advocate - Radhaballab Nagar — 170/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,341,323,336. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.reg - Criminal Regular

CNR: RJBR130002612016

Filing Number

319/2016

Filing Date

12-Apr-2016

Registration No

170/2016

Registration Date

12-Apr-2016

Court

JM Kishanganj Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

79

Police Station

Kishanganj Police Station

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,341,323,336

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state of rajasthan

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinod etc Advocate - Radhaballab Nagar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Rajasthan court acquitted all five accused persons (Vinod, Babulal, Mojiram, Prakash, and Jodha) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 336 read with Section 149 (rioting with common object causing hurt). While the court found the prosecution proved that accused Vinod and Babulal assaulted the victim Narendra on 27.03.2016, it acquitted them and four others due to insufficient evidence of a pre-planned unlawful assembly and common intention, granting them probation with conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 28-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 19-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 29-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 08-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 13-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 28-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 25-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 20-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 07-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 05-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 07-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 22-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 24-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 09-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 14-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 02-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 19-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 17-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 25-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 02-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 24-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 10-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 13-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 24-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 17-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 06-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 11-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 15-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 17-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 07-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 21-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 23-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 21-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 09-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 18-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  47. 09-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  48. 10-Dec-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  49. 14-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  50. 25-Jul-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  51. 20-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  52. 30-Mar-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  53. 29-Mar-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  54. 24-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  55. 05-Aug-2017

    —

    Jm

  56. 24-Jul-2017

    —

    Jm

  57. 13-Apr-2017

    —

    Jm

  58. 24-Jan-2017

    —

    Jm

  59. 13-Oct-2016

    —

    Jm

  60. 28-Jun-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 12-Apr-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 170/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Rajasthan court acquitted all five accused persons (Vinod, Babulal, Mojiram, Prakash, and Jodha) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 336 read with Section 149 (rioting with common object causing hurt). While the court found the prosecution proved that accused Vinod and Babulal assaulted the victim Narendra on 27.03.2016, it acquitted them and four others due to insufficient evidence of a pre-planned unlawful assembly and common intention, granting them probation with conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case