Rajasthan Government vs Radheyshyam Advocate - Girraj nagar — 87/2024
Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 19/54. Disposed: Uncontested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 06th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBR130002152024
Filing Number
215/2024
Filing Date
20-Feb-2024
Registration No
87/2024
Registration Date
20-Feb-2024
Court
JM Kishanganj Taluka
Judge
1-Jm
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Convicted and Released on Probation
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
184
Police Station
Bhanvargarh Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajasthan Government
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
-
1.Radheyshyam Advocate - Girraj nagar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate of Kishangarh, Baran (Rajasthan) convicted accused Radheshyam under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegal liquor possession, but instead of imposing imprisonment, released him on probation for 6 months under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering his poverty, voluntary confession, and first-time offense. The court imposed a bond of ₹5,000 with good conduct conditions and prosecution costs of ₹250. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
10-Mar-2026
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Jm
-
12-Dec-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Jm
-
15-Jul-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Jm
-
17-Mar-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Jm
-
22-Nov-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Jm
-
08-Oct-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Jm
-
01-Jul-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Jm
-
18-Apr-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
20-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 87/2024
The Judicial Magistrate of Kishangarh, Baran (Rajasthan) convicted accused Radheshyam under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegal liquor possession, but instead of imposing imprisonment, released him on probation for 6 months under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering his poverty, voluntary confession, and first-time offense. The court imposed a bond of ₹5,000 with good conduct conditions and prosecution costs of ₹250. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts