Rajasthan Government vs Radheyshyam Advocate - Girraj nagar — 87/2024
Case under Rajasthan Excise Act 1950 Section 19/54. Disposed: Uncontested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 06th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBR130002152024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
215/2024
Filing Date
20-02-2024
Registration No
87/2024
Registration Date
20-02-2024
Court
JM Kishanganj Taluka
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
184
Police Station
Bhanvargarh Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajasthan Government
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
Radheyshyam Advocate - Girraj nagar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant | |
| 12-12-2025 | Service of Non-bailable warrant | |
| 15-07-2025 | Service of Non-bailable warrant | |
| 17-03-2025 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate of Kishangarh, Baran (Rajasthan) convicted accused Radheshyam under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegal liquor possession, but instead of imposing imprisonment, released him on probation for 6 months under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering his poverty, voluntary confession, and first-time offense. The court imposed a bond of ₹5,000 with good conduct conditions and prosecution costs of ₹250. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate of Kishangarh, Baran (Rajasthan) convicted accused Radheshyam under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for illegal liquor possession, but instead of imposing imprisonment, released him on probation for 6 months under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering his poverty, voluntary confession, and first-time offense. The court imposed a bond of ₹5,000 with good conduct conditions and prosecution costs of ₹250. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts