State vs CHOTU LAL — 83/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,458. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBR130001332022
Filing Number
133/2022
Filing Date
10-Mar-2022
Registration No
83/2022
Registration Date
10-Mar-2022
Court
JM Kishanganj Taluka
Judge
1-Jm
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
Kishanganj Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHOTU LAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Chhotu Lal, of charges under IPC Section 458 (nighttime house-breaking) due to insufficient evidence, finding that no witness testified to the alleged nocturnal burglary. The accused had previously been acquitted of Sections 341 and 323 charges through settlement between parties, and the court noted that all prosecution witnesses were discredited or admitted to reconciliation with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
10-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
25-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
29-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
18-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
09-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
07-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
15-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
03-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
15-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
19-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
18-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 83/2022
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Chhotu Lal, of charges under IPC Section 458 (nighttime house-breaking) due to insufficient evidence, finding that no witness testified to the alleged nocturnal burglary. The accused had previously been acquitted of Sections 341 and 323 charges through settlement between parties, and the court noted that all prosecution witnesses were discredited or admitted to reconciliation with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts