State of Rajasthan vs Dhiraj Advocate - chandra mohan — 432/2017

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,20. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBR110009012017

Filing Number

901/2017

Filing Date

18-Sep-2017

Registration No

432/2017

Registration Date

18-Sep-2017

Court

JM Anta Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Sentenced

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

    Adv. apo

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dhiraj Advocate - chandra mohan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary Court Decision: The District Court of Bara, Rajasthan convicted accused Dheeraj (age 49) under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act for possession of 540 grams of ganja (cannabis). The court found the prosecution's evidence, including eyewitness testimony from police officials and FSL chemical analysis reports, sufficient to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Sentencing: The accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment for 4 years and fined ₹4,000, with 7 days of rigorous imprisonment as default punishment if fine remains unpaid. The court rejected the defense's argument that only police witnesses testified, holding that police evidence is admissible when credible and corroborated by documentary evidence like lab reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 11-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 01-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 16-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 26-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 17-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 08-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 06-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 24-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 10-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 24-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 19-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 04-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 18-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 18-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 18-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 18-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 17-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 22-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 05-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 20-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 06-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 13-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 09-Feb-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  36. 22-Oct-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  37. 05-Aug-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  38. 24-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 06-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 27-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 29-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 13-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 13-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 16-Aug-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 15-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 13-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  47. 16-Apr-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  48. 16-Nov-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  49. 18-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  50. 18-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 18-Sep-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 432/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The District Court of Bara, Rajasthan convicted accused Dheeraj (age 49) under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act for possession of 540 grams of ganja (cannabis). The court found the prosecution's evidence, including eyewitness testimony from police officials and FSL chemical analysis reports, sufficient to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Sentencing: The accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment for 4 years and fined ₹4,000, with 7 days of rigorous imprisonment as default punishment if fine remains unpaid. The court rejected the defense's argument that only police witnesses testified, holding that police evidence is admissible when credible and corroborated by documentary evidence like lab reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case