State of Rajasthan vs Shakil mhommad etc. Advocate - jakir ansari — 87/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBR110002802018

Filing Number

279/2018

Filing Date

24-Mar-2018

Registration No

87/2018

Registration Date

24-Mar-2018

Court

JM Anta Taluka

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Sentenced

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

    Adv. apo

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shakil mhommad etc. Advocate - jakir ansari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case 87/2018 Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted three accused—Shakil Mohammad, Rubina Bano, and Mohammad Shahid—under IPC sections 341, 323 (read with 34), 336 (read with 34), and imposed fines totaling ₹3,000 with simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court found them guilty of unlawful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and endangering life by pelting stones and bricks at the victims on 13-02-2018, causing injuries corroborated by medical evidence and eyewitness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 20-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 24-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 24-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 29-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 24-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 27-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 25-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 01-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 07-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 19-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 16-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 14-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 16-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 06-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 27-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 26-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 08-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 03-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 14-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 16-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 21-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 18-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 18-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 17-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 05-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 26-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 08-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 09-Jun-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 11-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 08-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 06-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 05-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 10-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 09-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 12-Feb-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 27-Sep-2018

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Jm

  47. 25-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 24-Mar-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case 87/2018 Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted three accused—Shakil Mohammad, Rubina Bano, and Mohammad Shahid—under IPC sections 341, 323 (read with 34), 336 (read with 34), and imposed fines totaling ₹3,000 with simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court found them guilty of unlawful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and endangering life by pelting stones and bricks at the victims on 13-02-2018, causing injuries corroborated by medical evidence and eyewitness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case