State of Rajasthan vs RAKESH GAUTAM Advocate - PARMOD KUMAR GALAV — 49/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,504,506. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st May 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBR110001582020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
158/2020
Filing Date
10-02-2020
Registration No
49/2020
Registration Date
10-02-2020
Court
JM Anta Taluka
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
01st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Rajasthan
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
RAKESH GAUTAM Advocate - PARMOD KUMAR GALAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Restored
Prosecution Evidence
Disposed
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-05-2026 | Restored | |
| 01-05-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 01-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant | |
| 23-12-2025 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate, Anta (Rajasthan) acquitted accused Rakesh Gotam of charges under IPC Sections 354(g), 504, and 506, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted the sole witness (complainant) was declared hostile by the prosecution, and the case involved a settlement between parties regarding Sections 504 and 506, resulting in the accused being acquitted of all charges under Section 354(g) as well due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate, Anta (Rajasthan) acquitted accused Rakesh Gotam of charges under IPC Sections 354(g), 504, and 506, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted the sole witness (complainant) was declared hostile by the prosecution, and the case involved a settlement between parties regarding Sections 504 and 506, resulting in the accused being acquitted of all charges under Section 354(g) as well due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts