State of Rajasthan vs Arman khan Advocate - R. Galav — 372/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85, 316(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBR070007662025

Filing Number

766/2025

Filing Date

19-Jun-2025

Registration No

372/2025

Registration Date

19-Jun-2025

Court

ACJM Court Chhabra Criminal Cases

Judge

2-Acjm-1

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

Chhabra Police Staion

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85, 316(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arman khan Advocate - R. Galav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case 372/2025 Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Arman Khan under IPC Section 316(2) based on a settlement (compromise) between the complainant (bride) and accused, but found him guilty under IPC Section 85 (cruelty) due to insufficient evidence proving dowry demand and physical/mental harassment, ultimately acquitting him for lack of corroborating testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm-1

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm-1

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 19-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 372/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 372/2025 Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Arman Khan under IPC Section 316(2) based on a settlement (compromise) between the complainant (bride) and accused, but found him guilty under IPC Section 85 (cruelty) due to insufficient evidence proving dowry demand and physical/mental harassment, ultimately acquitting him for lack of corroborating testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case