STATE vs Rakesh Kumar Advocate - D. K. Mehta — 3771/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Regular - Criminal Regular

CNR: RJBR070006682016

Filing Number

748/2016

Filing Date

16-Jul-2016

Registration No

3771/2016

Registration Date

16-Jul-2016

Court

ACJM Court Chhabra Criminal Cases

Judge

2-Acjm-1

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

320

Police Station

Chhabra Police Staion

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rakesh Kumar Advocate - D. K. Mehta

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Chhapda, Bara District, Rajasthan acquitted Rakesh Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving and causing hurt) on March 24, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused a motorcycle accident on June 1, 2016, citing critical gaps in evidence, inconsistencies in the victim's statement, and lack of corroborating medical documentation supporting the alleged incident date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm-1

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  8. 25-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  9. 27-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  10. 12-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  11. 12-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  12. 24-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  13. 17-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  14. 23-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  15. 16-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  16. 25-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  17. 27-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  18. 05-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  19. 16-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  20. 15-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  21. 25-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-2

  22. 21-Nov-2023

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm-2

  23. 23-Aug-2023

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm-2

  24. 31-May-2023

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm-2

  25. 22-Feb-2023

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm-2

  26. 30-Nov-2022

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm-2

  27. 29-Jul-2022

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm-1

  28. 27-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  29. 19-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  30. 26-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  31. 22-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  32. 14-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  33. 26-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  34. 26-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  35. 03-Apr-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm-1

  36. 30-Jan-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm-1

  37. 29-Aug-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm-1

  38. 07-Nov-2017

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Acjm-1

  39. 07-Sep-2017

    Charge

    Acjm-1

  40. 24-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 16-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3771/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Chhapda, Bara District, Rajasthan acquitted Rakesh Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving and causing hurt) on March 24, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused a motorcycle accident on June 1, 2016, citing critical gaps in evidence, inconsistencies in the victim's statement, and lack of corroborating medical documentation supporting the alleged incident date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case