STATE vs Rakesh Kumar Advocate - D. K. Mehta — 3771/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.
Cr. Regular - Criminal Regular
CNR: RJBR070006682016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
748/2016
Filing Date
16-07-2016
Registration No
3771/2016
Registration Date
16-07-2016
Court
ACJM Court Chhabra Criminal Cases
Judge
2-ACJM-1
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
320
Police Station
Chhabra Police Staion
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rakesh Kumar Advocate - D. K. Mehta
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM-1
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 12-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 16-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Chhapda, Bara District, Rajasthan acquitted Rakesh Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving and causing hurt) on March 24, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused a motorcycle accident on June 1, 2016, citing critical gaps in evidence, inconsistencies in the victim's statement, and lack of corroborating medical documentation supporting the alleged incident date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Chhapda, Bara District, Rajasthan acquitted Rakesh Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash driving and causing hurt) on March 24, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused a motorcycle accident on June 1, 2016, citing critical gaps in evidence, inconsistencies in the victim's statement, and lack of corroborating medical documentation supporting the alleged incident date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts