Rajasthan Goverment vs Sunny etc. Advocate - Abhinav Gautam — 221/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,308,504,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBR050008162021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
719/2021
Filing Date
03-12-2021
Registration No
221/2021
Registration Date
03-12-2021
Court
SCST Baran HQ
Judge
2-Judge Spl Court
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
716
Police Station
Chhabra Police Staion
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajasthan Goverment
Adv. spp
Respondent(s)
Sunny etc. Advocate - Abhinav Gautam
Vikram
Dinesh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judge Spl Court
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-04-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 06-04-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 28-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 27-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Court, Baran acquitted all three accused (Sanni Sahariya, Vikram Mehtar, and Dinesh) on April 20, 2026, finding insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the complainant's own statement contradicted the FIR narrative—he testified he fell from his motorcycle rather than being beaten by the accused, and denied receiving caste-based insults. With eyewitnesses also denying any assault by the accused and no credible evidence of intentional injury, the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC Sections 308/34 and SC/ST Act provisions, warranting acquittal based on benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District Court, Baran acquitted all three accused (Sanni Sahariya, Vikram Mehtar, and Dinesh) on April 20, 2026, finding insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the complainant's own statement contradicted the FIR narrative—he testified he fell from his motorcycle rather than being beaten by the accused, and denied receiving caste-based insults. With eyewitnesses also denying any assault by the accused and no credible evidence of intentional injury, the prosecution failed to prove charges under IPC Sections 308/34 and SC/ST Act provisions, warranting acquittal based on benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts