Ashok kumar vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP — 6/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 10th March 2026.
Cr. Revision
CNR: RJBR050007682025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
768/2025
Filing Date
05-12-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Court
SCST Baran HQ
Judge
2-Judge Spl Court
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
FIR Details
FIR Number
150
Police Station
Sadar Police Station, Baran
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok kumar
Adv. surendra kumar meena
Respondent(s)
State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judge Spl Court
Disposed
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service | |
| 10-02-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service | |
| 16-01-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District and Sessions Court, Baran (Rajasthan) dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ashok Kumar on March 10, 2026, upholding the lower court's order dated October 8, 2025. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 281 and 106(1), and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3/181 and 146/196, based on evidence that his motorcycle (RJ 28 SF 3974) collided with the victim's motorcycle, resulting in fatal injuries. The court found the investigation and charges substantiated by witness statements and evidence, rejecting the petitioner's claims of procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District and Sessions Court, Baran (Rajasthan) dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ashok Kumar on March 10, 2026, upholding the lower court's order dated October 8, 2025. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 281 and 106(1), and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 3/181 and 146/196, based on evidence that his motorcycle (RJ 28 SF 3974) collided with the victim's motorcycle, resulting in fatal injuries. The court found the investigation and charges substantiated by witness statements and evidence, rejecting the petitioner's claims of procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts