Rajasthan Goverment vs narendar gurjar Advocate - manoj Kumar jain — 89/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJBR050001842018

Filing Number

190/2018

Filing Date

21-Jun-2018

Registration No

89/2018

Registration Date

21-Jun-2018

Court

SCST Baran HQ

Judge

2-Judge Spl Court

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

Anta Police Station

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 506
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(s)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Goverment

    Adv. spp

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.narendar gurjar Advocate - manoj Kumar jain

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary State v. Narendra Gurjar (Session Case 88/2018, Bara District Court, Rajasthan) The court acquitted the accused, Narendra Gurjar, of charges under Section 506 IPC (criminal intimidation) and Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant was not examined as a witness, key eyewitnesses were declared hostile and retracted their statements, and there was credible evidence of prior civil dispute between the parties, suggesting a false case motivated by vendetta rather than genuine grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Spl Court

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Judge Spl Court

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Judge Spl Court

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Order sheetView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Order sheetView PDF

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Order sheetView PDF

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Order sheetView PDF

  13. 17-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  15. 04-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  16. 27-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  17. 16-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  18. 26-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  19. 07-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  20. 01-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  21. 08-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  22. 28-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  23. 22-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  24. 20-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  25. 06-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  26. 12-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  27. 26-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  28. 29-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  29. 22-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  30. 02-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  31. 12-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Judge Spl Court

  32. 05-Apr-2023

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  33. 07-Jan-2023

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  34. 12-Oct-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  35. 30-Jul-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  36. 16-Jun-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  37. 24-Mar-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  38. 04-Feb-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  39. 03-Dec-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  40. 01-Sep-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  41. 09-Jul-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  42. 24-May-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  43. 15-Feb-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  44. 20-Nov-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  45. 31-Aug-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  46. 27-Aug-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  47. 16-Jul-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  48. 18-Jun-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  49. 20-May-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  50. 22-Apr-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  51. 20-Mar-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  52. 21-Nov-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  53. 17-Aug-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  54. 27-May-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  55. 15-Mar-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  56. 16-Jan-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  57. 29-Nov-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  58. 23-Oct-2018

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Judge Spl Court

  59. 23-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 21-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary State v. Narendra Gurjar (Session Case 88/2018, Bara District Court, Rajasthan) The court acquitted the accused, Narendra Gurjar, of charges under Section 506 IPC (criminal intimidation) and Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant was not examined as a witness, key eyewitnesses were declared hostile and retracted their statements, and there was credible evidence of prior civil dispute between the parties, suggesting a false case motivated by vendetta rather than genuine grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case