Rajasthan Goverment vs narendar gurjar Advocate - manoj Kumar jain — 89/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBR050001842018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
190/2018
Filing Date
21-06-2018
Registration No
89/2018
Registration Date
21-06-2018
Court
SCST Baran HQ
Judge
2-Judge Spl Court
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
Anta Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajasthan Goverment
Adv. spp
Respondent(s)
narendar gurjar Advocate - manoj Kumar jain
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judge Spl Court
Disposed
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 30-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 17-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary State v. Narendra Gurjar (Session Case 88/2018, Bara District Court, Rajasthan) The court acquitted the accused, Narendra Gurjar, of charges under Section 506 IPC (criminal intimidation) and Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant was not examined as a witness, key eyewitnesses were declared hostile and retracted their statements, and there was credible evidence of prior civil dispute between the parties, suggesting a false case motivated by vendetta rather than genuine grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary State v. Narendra Gurjar (Session Case 88/2018, Bara District Court, Rajasthan) The court acquitted the accused, Narendra Gurjar, of charges under Section 506 IPC (criminal intimidation) and Section 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant was not examined as a witness, key eyewitnesses were declared hostile and retracted their statements, and there was credible evidence of prior civil dispute between the parties, suggesting a false case motivated by vendetta rather than genuine grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts