BHAWANI SINGH URF NANHA vs State Of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP — 103/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,3(5),. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 10th March 2026.

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBR050001822026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

182/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

SCST Baran HQ

Judge

2-Judge Spl Court

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

FIR Details

FIR Number

187

Police Station

Kotwali Police Station Baran

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,3(5),
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r)(s),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

BHAWANI SINGH URF NANHA

Adv. Bharat Bushan Saxena

Respondent(s)

State Of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judge Spl Court

10-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order

Summary The court granted bail to accused Bhani Singh (alias Nanha) under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 3(5) and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(Va). The court found that while the complainant suffered three simple injuries and allegations included abusive language and physical altercation during a tailor visit, the severity did not warrant continued custody, especially given the accused's prior record involved only minor violations. The accused was released on bail with conditions including regular court appearance, non-intimidation of witnesses, and a bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to accused Bhani Singh (alias Nanha) under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 3(5) and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(Va). The court found that while the complainant suffered three simple injuries and allegations included abusive language and physical altercation during a tailor visit, the severity did not warrant continued custody, especially given the accused's prior record involved only minor violations. The accused was released on bail with conditions including regular court appearance, non-intimidation of witnesses, and a bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SCST Baran HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case