BHAWANI SINGH URF NANHA vs State Of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP — 103/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,3(5),. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 10th March 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJBR050001822026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
182/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
103/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
SCST Baran HQ
Judge
2-Judge Spl Court
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
187
Police Station
Kotwali Police Station Baran
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAWANI SINGH URF NANHA
Adv. Bharat Bushan Saxena
Respondent(s)
State Of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judge Spl Court
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to accused Bhani Singh (alias Nanha) under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 3(5) and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(Va). The court found that while the complainant suffered three simple injuries and allegations included abusive language and physical altercation during a tailor visit, the severity did not warrant continued custody, especially given the accused's prior record involved only minor violations. The accused was released on bail with conditions including regular court appearance, non-intimidation of witnesses, and a bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted bail to accused Bhani Singh (alias Nanha) under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 3(5) and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(Va). The court found that while the complainant suffered three simple injuries and allegations included abusive language and physical altercation during a tailor visit, the severity did not warrant continued custody, especially given the accused's prior record involved only minor violations. The accused was released on bail with conditions including regular court appearance, non-intimidation of witnesses, and a bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts