Rajasthan Goverment vs Vajir singh Advocate - Mahesh Prakash Gautam — 47/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBR050000852019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
85/2019
Filing Date
28-05-2019
Registration No
47/2019
Registration Date
28-05-2019
Court
SCST Baran HQ
Judge
2-Judge Spl Court
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
645
Police Station
Kotwali Police Station Baran
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajasthan Goverment
Adv. SPP
Respondent(s)
Vajir singh Advocate - Mahesh Prakash Gautam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judge Spl Court
Disposed
Judgment
Final arguments
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 25-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 20-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 16-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court acquitted constable Wazir Singh of charges under Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, finding insufficient evidence that he committed the alleged offense with knowledge of the victim's caste status. While the accused was earlier acquitted of assault charges (IPC Sections 341, 323, 504) following a settlement between parties, the court determined the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the atrocity act was caste-motivated, as no independent witness corroborated the victim's claims of caste-based insults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court acquitted constable Wazir Singh of charges under Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, finding insufficient evidence that he committed the alleged offense with knowledge of the victim's caste status. While the accused was earlier acquitted of assault charges (IPC Sections 341, 323, 504) following a settlement between parties, the court determined the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the atrocity act was caste-motivated, as no independent witness corroborated the victim's claims of caste-based insults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts