Rajasthan Goverment vs Vajir singh Advocate - Mahesh Prakash Gautam — 47/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBR050000852019
Filing Number
85/2019
Filing Date
28-May-2019
Registration No
47/2019
Registration Date
28-May-2019
Court
SCST Baran HQ
Judge
2-Judge Spl Court
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
645
Police Station
Kotwali Police Station Baran
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajasthan Goverment
Adv. SPP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vajir singh Advocate - Mahesh Prakash Gautam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary The court acquitted constable Wazir Singh of charges under Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, finding insufficient evidence that he committed the alleged offense with knowledge of the victim's caste status. While the accused was earlier acquitted of assault charges (IPC Sections 341, 323, 504) following a settlement between parties, the court determined the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the atrocity act was caste-motivated, as no independent witness corroborated the victim's claims of caste-based insults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Spl Court
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgment
Judge Spl Court
-
25-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Judge Spl Court
-
20-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
16-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
06-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
31-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
30-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
09-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
27-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
01-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
25-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
16-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
03-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
13-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
16-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
19-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
11-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
01-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
10-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
05-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
22-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
27-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
19-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
06-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
17-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
21-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
05-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
05-May-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
11-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Judge Spl Court
-
09-Nov-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
01-Oct-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
28-Jul-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
08-Jun-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
22-Apr-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
06-Jan-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
19-Oct-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
02-Jul-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
04-Jun-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
06-May-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
04-Apr-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
30-Nov-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
Judge Spl Court
-
22-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-May-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 47/2019
Case Summary The court acquitted constable Wazir Singh of charges under Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, finding insufficient evidence that he committed the alleged offense with knowledge of the victim's caste status. While the accused was earlier acquitted of assault charges (IPC Sections 341, 323, 504) following a settlement between parties, the court determined the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the atrocity act was caste-motivated, as no independent witness corroborated the victim's claims of caste-based insults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts