Rajasthan Goverment vs Shyamlal Agrawal Advocate - manoj Kumar jain — 350/2016

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,20. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBR020017582016

Filing Number

350/2016

Filing Date

08-Sep-2016

Registration No

350/2016

Registration Date

08-Sep-2016

Court

CJM ACJM JM Baran HQ

Judge

4-CJM Baran

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Sentenced

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

197

Police Station

Woman Police Station, Baran

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Goverment

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shyamlal Agrawal Advocate - manoj Kumar jain

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Court's Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Baran, Rajasthan convicted accused Shyamlal Agarwal under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act on March 12, 2026, for illegal possession of 250 grams of narcotic drug (cannabis). The court found sufficient evidence through witness testimony and seizure records proving the accused was caught with the contraband substance without authorization. Sentence: The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹500, with 15 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. Seized narcotic material and recovered cash (₹600) were ordered to be forfeited to the government after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM Baran

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    CJM Baran

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    CJM Baran

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  8. 02-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 01-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 27-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 17-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 01-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 28-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 28-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 18-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 16-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 18-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 31-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 18-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 30-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 23-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 16-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 20-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 04-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 16-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 19-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 05-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 04-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 17-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 05-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 01-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 18-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 17-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 11-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  36. 03-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  37. 10-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  38. 22-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  39. 26-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  40. 17-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  41. 22-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  42. 28-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  43. 24-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  44. 14-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  45. 12-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  46. 20-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  47. 12-Jun-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  48. 06-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  49. 29-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  50. 10-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  51. 24-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  52. 08-Aug-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  53. 14-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  54. 19-Dec-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  55. 27-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  56. 04-Jul-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  57. 03-May-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  58. 05-Mar-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  59. 02-Feb-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  60. 06-Oct-2017

    —

    CJM Baran

  61. 27-Jun-2017

    —

    CJM Baran

  62. 15-Feb-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 08-Sep-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 350/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court's Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Baran, Rajasthan convicted accused Shyamlal Agarwal under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act on March 12, 2026, for illegal possession of 250 grams of narcotic drug (cannabis). The court found sufficient evidence through witness testimony and seizure records proving the accused was caught with the contraband substance without authorization. Sentence: The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹500, with 15 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. Seized narcotic material and recovered cash (₹600) were ordered to be forfeited to the government after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case