Rajasthan Goverment (W) vs Chintu gurjar Advocate - Asalam bharti — 1235/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379120b. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 09th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. - Criminal Regular
CNR: RJBR020013022016
Filing Number
1443/2016
Filing Date
01-Sep-2016
Registration No
1235/2016
Registration Date
01-Sep-2016
Court
CJM ACJM JM Baran HQ
Judge
4-CJM Baran
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
99
Police Station
Woman Police Station, Baran
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajasthan Goverment (W)
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chintu gurjar Advocate - Asalam bharti
-
2.Dinesh Bhargav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baran (Rajasthan) convicted accused Chintu Gujjar and Dinesh Bhargav on March 9, 2026, for illegally extracting stone from the Parvati River without permission under IPC Sections 379, 120B, MMRD Act Rules 4/21, and MVM Act 146/196. The court found the prosecution's witness testimony and documentary evidence (including seizure records and site inspection maps) sufficient to prove the offenses, and sentenced them to probation with a ₹10,000 surety bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
CJM Baran
-
07-Mar-2026
Final arguments
CJM Baran
-
05-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
CJM Baran
-
04-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
09-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
23-Dec-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Acjm
-
10-Nov-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Acjm
-
20-Sep-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Acjm
-
05-Aug-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
08-Jul-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
18-Jun-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
05-May-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
26-Mar-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
18-Jan-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
20-Nov-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
27-Sep-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
16-Aug-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
06-Jun-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
03-Apr-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
16-Feb-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
20-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
25-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
22-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
29-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
06-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
08-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
26-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
08-Apr-2022
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
15-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
27-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
08-Sep-2021
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
19-Apr-2021
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
08-Jan-2021
Service of Non-bailable warrant
CJM Baran
-
16-Jul-2020
Service of Non-bailable warrant
CJM Baran
-
09-Jun-2020
Service of Non-bailable warrant
CJM Baran
-
02-May-2020
Service of Non-bailable warrant
CJM Baran
-
20-Mar-2020
Service of Non-bailable warrant
CJM Baran
-
24-Oct-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
CJM Baran
-
17-Aug-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
CJM Baran
-
29-Mar-2019
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
12-Nov-2018
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
18-Jul-2018
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
05-May-2018
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
22-Jan-2018
Prosecution Evidence
CJM Baran
-
11-Aug-2017
—
CJM Baran
-
26-Apr-2017
Charge
CJM Baran
-
07-Feb-2017
Charge
CJM Baran
-
20-Dec-2016
Charge
Acjm
-
03-Nov-2016
Charge
Acjm
-
01-Sep-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Sep-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 1235/2016
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baran (Rajasthan) convicted accused Chintu Gujjar and Dinesh Bhargav on March 9, 2026, for illegally extracting stone from the Parvati River without permission under IPC Sections 379, 120B, MMRD Act Rules 4/21, and MVM Act 146/196. The court found the prosecution's witness testimony and documentary evidence (including seizure records and site inspection maps) sufficient to prove the offenses, and sentenced them to probation with a ₹10,000 surety bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts