Rajasthan Goverment (S) vs Molak Chand Advocate - Jitendra Nagar — 1041/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. - Criminal Regular
CNR: RJBR020011132016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1243/2016
Filing Date
12-08-2016
Registration No
1041/2016
Registration Date
12-08-2016
Court
CJM ACJM JM Baran HQ
Judge
4-CJM Baran
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
536
Police Station
Sadar Police Station, Baran
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajasthan Goverment (S)
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Molak Chand Advocate - Jitendra Nagar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CJM Baran
Disposed
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant | |
| 25-02-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant | |
| 23-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 17-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bara, Rajasthan acquitted the accused Molakchand in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). The court found that while the prosecution presented evidence of a motorcycle accident on July 12, 2016, no witness could identify the accused as the driver of the allegedly rash vehicle, no physical evidence conclusively proved the accused's involvement, and the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted and released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bara, Rajasthan acquitted the accused Molakchand in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). The court found that while the prosecution presented evidence of a motorcycle accident on July 12, 2016, no witness could identify the accused as the driver of the allegedly rash vehicle, no physical evidence conclusively proved the accused's involvement, and the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted and released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts