Rajasthan Goverment vs Manoj Sahariya Advocate - Shyam Paliwal — 324/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,401. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBR020005312017

Filing Number

529/2017

Filing Date

10-Jun-2016

Registration No

324/2017

Registration Date

10-Jun-2016

Court

CJM ACJM JM Baran HQ

Judge

4-CJM Baran

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

Woman Police Station, Baran

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,401

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Goverment

    Adv. Apo

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Sahariya Advocate - Shyam Paliwal

  2. 2.Rakesh @ Kalu

    Adv. Rajesh Jayant

  3. 3.Durgashankar

    Adv. Rajesh Jayant

  4. 4.Hemraj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Baran district acquitted accused Rakesh Urf Kalu and Hemraj under IPC Sections 379 and 401 (theft and criminal breach of trust) on March 30, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish ownership of the allegedly stolen tractor-trolley through documentary evidence, the recovery location was an open field with unclear ownership, and critical witnesses provided inconsistent testimony lacking corroboration. Benefit of doubt was granted to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM Baran

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    CJM Baran

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    CJM Baran

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    CJM Baran

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    CJM Baran

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    CJM Baran

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    CJM Baran

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    CJM Baran

  11. 19-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  13. 16-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  14. 31-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  15. 19-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM Baran

  16. 20-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 08-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 24-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 10-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 24-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 01-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 02-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 11-Jun-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  24. 08-May-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  25. 10-Feb-2025

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  26. 03-Dec-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  27. 01-Oct-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  28. 02-Aug-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  29. 03-Jun-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  30. 30-Mar-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  31. 11-Jan-2024

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  32. 01-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 22-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 28-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 29-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 23-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 23-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 29-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 01-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 01-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 21-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 12-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 15-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 01-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 06-Jan-2022

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  46. 20-Nov-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  47. 08-Oct-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  48. 29-Sep-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  49. 15-Sep-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  50. 02-Sep-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  51. 24-Aug-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  52. 03-Aug-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  53. 21-Jun-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  54. 11-May-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  55. 08-Apr-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  56. 20-Feb-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  57. 21-Jan-2021

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  58. 23-Dec-2020

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  59. 21-Oct-2020

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  60. 26-Aug-2020

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  61. 04-Jul-2020

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  62. 29-Apr-2020

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Acjm

  63. 16-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  64. 10-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  65. 15-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  66. 08-Aug-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  67. 29-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  68. 18-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  69. 31-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  70. 31-Oct-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  71. 06-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  72. 18-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  73. 03-May-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  74. 12-Mar-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Civil Judge and Jm

  75. 31-Jan-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Civil Judge and Jm

  76. 31-Oct-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Civil Judge and Jm

  77. 09-Aug-2017

    —

    Addl Civil Judge and Jm

  78. 27-May-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  79. 10-Jun-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 324/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Baran district acquitted accused Rakesh Urf Kalu and Hemraj under IPC Sections 379 and 401 (theft and criminal breach of trust) on March 30, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish ownership of the allegedly stolen tractor-trolley through documentary evidence, the recovery location was an open field with unclear ownership, and critical witnesses provided inconsistent testimony lacking corroboration. Benefit of doubt was granted to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case