Ghinsi vs Gajendra Singh Advocate - baneraj singh — 98/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
MACT Main - MACP
CNR: RJBR010014752022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
294/2022
Filing Date
13-07-2022
Registration No
98/2022
Registration Date
13-07-2022
Court
DJ ADJ Baran HQ
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ghinsi
Adv. Banwari Meena
Respondent(s)
Gajendra Singh Advocate - baneraj singh
Laeek Mohammad
Adv. Bal Mukund Khandelwal
United India Insu.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge
Defendant Evidence
Defendant Evidence
Defendant Evidence
Defendant Evidence
Defendant Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Defendant Evidence | |
| 30-03-2026 | Defendant Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Defendant Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Defendant Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Defendant Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court order dated 17.03.2026 partially allowed the petition. The court directed defendant no. 2 (Biima Company) to issue an Aadhar card-based salary passbook and furnish a fitness certificate to defendant no. 3 (finance officer) within 7 days. The petition regarding defendant no. 1 was dismissed due to lack of proper documentation and evidence. Compliance affidavits must be filed by 24.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court order dated 17.03.2026 partially allowed the petition. The court directed defendant no. 2 (Biima Company) to issue an Aadhar card-based salary passbook and furnish a fitness certificate to defendant no. 3 (finance officer) within 7 days. The petition regarding defendant no. 1 was dismissed due to lack of proper documentation and evidence. Compliance affidavits must be filed by 24.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts