Rajasthan Goverment vs Murali urf Murlidhar Advocate - Lal Singh Maran — 148/2018
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/29,8/21. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBR010009962018
Filing Number
490/2018
Filing Date
27-Sep-2018
Registration No
148/2018
Registration Date
27-Sep-2018
Court
DJ ADJ Baran HQ
Judge
3-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
93
Police Station
Kotwali Police Station Baran
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajasthan Goverment
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Murali urf Murlidhar Advocate - Lal Singh Maran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
all order sheetView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
all order sheetView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the appeal filed by the Muslim Urfī employee against the Chopadbond Jail's decision to impose punishment under Section 8/29 of the Prisons Act, 1985. The court found the punishment justified as the employee violated prison regulations and upheld the lower court's order directing him to submit a bond of ₹10,000 within six months, holding that no grounds existed to interfere with the disciplinary action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
07-Mar-2026
all order sheetView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgment
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
23-Feb-2026
all order sheetView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgment
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
20-Feb-2026
all order sheetView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
17-Feb-2026
all order sheetView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
13-Feb-2026
all order sheetView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
06-Feb-2026
all order sheetView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
16-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
16-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
08-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
02-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
25-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
24-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
18-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
04-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
19-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
19-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
28-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
08-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
13-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
30-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
22-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
03-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
16-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
04-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
15-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
15-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
17-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
22-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
07-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Apr-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Jun-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Mar-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Jun-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
29-Apr-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Jan-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Dec-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Oct-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Oct-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Sep-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
29-Jul-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
28-May-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
-
27-May-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
-
05-Apr-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
14-Feb-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2018
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Nov-2018
Hearing arguments on Charge
District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 148/2018
Summary The court dismissed the appeal filed by the Muslim Urfī employee against the Chopadbond Jail's decision to impose punishment under Section 8/29 of the Prisons Act, 1985. The court found the punishment justified as the employee violated prison regulations and upheld the lower court's order directing him to submit a bond of ₹10,000 within six months, holding that no grounds existed to interfere with the disciplinary action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts