Kishor Kumar Panchal vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP — 169/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBR010004842026

Filing Number

387/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Baran HQ

Judge

3-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Sadar Police Station, Baran

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kishor Kumar Panchal

    Adv. Shailesh Kumar Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of Kishore Kumar Panchal under Section 483 CrPC in a case involving alleged drug trafficking under the NDPS Act. The court found that the accused was involved in selling a significant quantity of narcotics (approximately 5 kg) and had a prior criminal record; despite being released on bail earlier, he allegedly committed the offense again, demonstrating a pattern of criminal behavior that warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of Kishore Kumar Panchal under Section 483 CrPC in a case involving alleged drug trafficking under the NDPS Act. The court found that the accused was involved in selling a significant quantity of narcotics (approximately 5 kg) and had a prior criminal record; despite being released on bail earlier, he allegedly committed the offense again, demonstrating a pattern of criminal behavior that warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case