Vishal @ Vikki Gochar vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP — 168/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 11th March 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJBR010004782026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
383/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
168/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Baran HQ
Judge
3-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
Anta Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishal @ Vikki Gochar
Adv. Vijay Singh Chauhan
Respondent(s)
State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Judge in Baran, Rajasthan rejected the bail plea of Vishal alias Vicky Gochar under Section 483 CRPC in Case No. 66/2026. The court found that the accused was arrested for selling narcotic drugs (smack) under NDPS Act provisions, with substantial quantities recovered in his possession, and that he had prior criminal records involving similar drug-related offenses, indicating a pattern of repeat criminal behavior. Given the serious nature of the charges, the prevalence of drug trafficking in the region, and the accused's criminal history, the court deemed bail unjustified and dismissed the application on March 11, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Special Judge in Baran, Rajasthan rejected the bail plea of Vishal alias Vicky Gochar under Section 483 CRPC in Case No. 66/2026. The court found that the accused was arrested for selling narcotic drugs (smack) under NDPS Act provisions, with substantial quantities recovered in his possession, and that he had prior criminal records involving similar drug-related offenses, indicating a pattern of repeat criminal behavior. Given the serious nature of the charges, the prevalence of drug trafficking in the region, and the accused's criminal history, the court deemed bail unjustified and dismissed the application on March 11, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts