Vishal @ Vikki Gochar vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP — 168/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBR010004782026

Filing Number

383/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Baran HQ

Judge

3-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

Anta Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishal @ Vikki Gochar

    Adv. Vijay Singh Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge in Baran, Rajasthan rejected the bail plea of Vishal alias Vicky Gochar under Section 483 CRPC in Case No. 66/2026. The court found that the accused was arrested for selling narcotic drugs (smack) under NDPS Act provisions, with substantial quantities recovered in his possession, and that he had prior criminal records involving similar drug-related offenses, indicating a pattern of repeat criminal behavior. Given the serious nature of the charges, the prevalence of drug trafficking in the region, and the accused's criminal history, the court deemed bail unjustified and dismissed the application on March 11, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge in Baran, Rajasthan rejected the bail plea of Vishal alias Vicky Gochar under Section 483 CRPC in Case No. 66/2026. The court found that the accused was arrested for selling narcotic drugs (smack) under NDPS Act provisions, with substantial quantities recovered in his possession, and that he had prior criminal records involving similar drug-related offenses, indicating a pattern of repeat criminal behavior. Given the serious nature of the charges, the prevalence of drug trafficking in the region, and the accused's criminal history, the court deemed bail unjustified and dismissed the application on March 11, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case