Dharma @ Dharmveer Banjara vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - P P — 156/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 10th March 2026.

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBR010004102026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

321/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

156/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Baran HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

Bhanwargrah Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

Dharma @ Dharmveer Banjara

Adv. Pouras Singh

Respondent(s)

State of Rajasthan Advocate - P P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order

Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court in Baran, Rajasthan, granted bail to both accused Mukim and Dharma Urf Dharamvir Banjara in two criminal cases (Nos. 80/2026 and 84/2026) involving charges under IPC Section 303(2) for theft of 18 cattle. The court found that while one accused had prior criminal history, neither the offense nor the investigation stage warranted continued custody, and bail conditions could ensure court attendance and prevent witness tampering or crime repetition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court in Baran, Rajasthan, granted bail to both accused Mukim and Dharma Urf Dharamvir Banjara in two criminal cases (Nos. 80/2026 and 84/2026) involving charges under IPC Section 303(2) for theft of 18 cattle. The court found that while one accused had prior criminal history, neither the offense nor the investigation stage warranted continued custody, and bail conditions could ensure court attendance and prevent witness tampering or crime repetition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Baran HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case