Dharma @ Dharmveer Banjara vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - P P — 156/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBR010004102026

Filing Number

321/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

156/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Baran HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

Bhanwargrah Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dharma @ Dharmveer Banjara

    Adv. Pouras Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - P P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court in Baran, Rajasthan, granted bail to both accused Mukim and Dharma Urf Dharamvir Banjara in two criminal cases (Nos. 80/2026 and 84/2026) involving charges under IPC Section 303(2) for theft of 18 cattle. The court found that while one accused had prior criminal history, neither the offense nor the investigation stage warranted continued custody, and bail conditions could ensure court attendance and prevent witness tampering or crime repetition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 156/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court in Baran, Rajasthan, granted bail to both accused Mukim and Dharma Urf Dharamvir Banjara in two criminal cases (Nos. 80/2026 and 84/2026) involving charges under IPC Section 303(2) for theft of 18 cattle. The court found that while one accused had prior criminal history, neither the offense nor the investigation stage warranted continued custody, and bail conditions could ensure court attendance and prevent witness tampering or crime repetition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case