Mukim Atmaj Majid vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - P P — 152/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 10th March 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJBR010004022026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
318/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
152/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Baran HQ
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
Bhanwargrah Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mukim Atmaj Majid
Adv. Pouras Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Rajasthan Advocate - P P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court, Barmer (Rajasthan) granted bail to two accused—Mukkim and Dharma Urf Dharamveer Banjara—in a cattle theft case (FIR No. 12/2026, IPC Section 303(2)). The court accepted their bail pleas under Section 483 CrPC, imposing conditions including Rs. 25,000 personal bonds each, Rs. 50,000 surety bonds each, and requirements to attend all hearings and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court, Barmer (Rajasthan) granted bail to two accused—Mukkim and Dharma Urf Dharamveer Banjara—in a cattle theft case (FIR No. 12/2026, IPC Section 303(2)). The court accepted their bail pleas under Section 483 CrPC, imposing conditions including Rs. 25,000 personal bonds each, Rs. 50,000 surety bonds each, and requirements to attend all hearings and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts