Soran Singh @ Sourabh vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP — 151/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBR010003992026

Filing Number

315/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

151/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Baran HQ

Judge

3-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

Sadar Police Station, Baran

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Soran Singh @ Sourabh

    Adv. Brijmohan Goyal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Sauran Singh Urf Sourabh under Section 483 CrPC on the condition that he furnishes two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each and deposits Rs. 50,000 with the court. The court found that while 2.41 kg of contraband ganja was seized from the accused, he had no prior criminal record, had been in custody for considerable time, and the investigation could be completed without prolonged detention, warranting bail on reasonable terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge I

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge I

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 151/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Sauran Singh Urf Sourabh under Section 483 CrPC on the condition that he furnishes two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each and deposits Rs. 50,000 with the court. The court found that while 2.41 kg of contraband ganja was seized from the accused, he had no prior criminal record, had been in custody for considerable time, and the investigation could be completed without prolonged detention, warranting bail on reasonable terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case