Suraj Dangi vs State of Rajasthan Advocate - P P — 146/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJBR010003562026

Filing Number

274/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

146/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Baran HQ

Judge

4-ADJ II

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

617

Police Station

Kotwali Police Station Baran

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suraj Dangi

    Adv. Chen Singh Sirohiya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Rajasthan Advocate - P P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional District and Session Court, Bara (Rajasthan) rejected the bail petition of Suraj Dangi under Section 483 CrPC on 09.03.2026. The court found credible evidence that Dangi actively participated in the murder of Shah Rukh, involving multiple accused persons, and determined that granting bail would risk witness tampering given the case's serious nature and ongoing investigation. The bail application was dismissed, with the court emphasizing that the gravity of the offense and established involvement warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ II

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 146/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional District and Session Court, Bara (Rajasthan) rejected the bail petition of Suraj Dangi under Section 483 CrPC on 09.03.2026. The court found credible evidence that Dangi actively participated in the murder of Shah Rukh, involving multiple accused persons, and determined that granting bail would risk witness tampering given the case's serious nature and ongoing investigation. The bail application was dismissed, with the court emphasizing that the gravity of the offense and established involvement warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case